Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 01. Sep 2024, 13:47:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vb1k5i$1fqn5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 01.09.2024 01:05, skrev Richard Hachel:
 To say that Minkowski spacetime is an approach to reality is a huge bluff.
This is like saying that addition is an approach to multiplication. >
A fanatic of the theory of the equality of two operations will tell you
that it is very close, because 1+2 makes three, and 1x2 makes 2; and two is not far from three.
 So multiplying or adding is the same reality.
 This is what a fanatic will tell you.
 Then, things will get worse, and Python will come to support:
"But yes, it is the same reality, it is the same operation because 0+0 makes zero; and if I do 0x0 I still have zero, the equivalence is perfect."
 And then Paul will come and support: "But yes, multiplying and adding are the same thing, we will show that 2+2=4, and that 2x2=4."
 Well you see, you do the same thing by saying: "Minkowski is very close to reality, because on Galilean frames of reference, it works".
 Except that Doctor Hachel, who worked for forty years on the subject, says that maybe, but that it no longer works for accelerated frames of reference, nor for rotating frames of reference.
 It no longer works, but NOT AT ALL!!!
 As 4+9 gives 13, and 4x9 gives 36.
 13 and 36, it's not the same at all.
Since Doctor Hachel claims that Python and Paul claim that addition
and multiplication are the same, Doctor Hachel must obviously be
much smarter than Python and Paul.
Elementary Hachelian logic!

 Well with Richard Hachel's relativity, we obtain a real relativistic perfection. With that of physicists, based on Minkowski, we only obtain bullshit.
 Poincaré and Hachel: two Frenchmen. A formidable advance in the understanding of the universe.
 Einstein and Minkowski, two Germans: a formidable derailment of the relativistic theory.
Quite.
SR and GR don't work in the Hachelian fantastic relativistic world.
SR even claims that clocks can be synchronous in an inertial frame,
and that the speed of light is invariant and not depending on
the position of Richard Hachel!
In the real world, OTOH, is SR and GR thoroughly tested and
never falsified.
https://paulba.no/paper/index.html
But of course, experimental evidence in the real world has nothing
to do with what can and can't happen in the Hachelian world.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Aug 24 * The problem of relativistic synchronisation102Richard Hachel
23 Aug 24 +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation85Mikko
23 Aug 24 i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation84Richard Hachel
23 Aug 24 i +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation82Python
30 Aug 24 i i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation81Richard Hachel
30 Aug 24 i i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation80Paul.B.Andersen
30 Aug 24 i i  +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
30 Aug 24 i i  +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
31 Aug 24 i i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation77Thomas Heger
31 Aug 24 i i   +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation75Richard Hachel
31 Aug 24 i i   i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation58Paul.B.Andersen
31 Aug 24 i i   ii`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation57Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   ii +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
1 Sep 24 i i   ii +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation53Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i+- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Maciej Wozniak
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation51Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation50Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation49Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation10Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   ii`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation7Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation6Ross Finlayson
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation5Ross Finlayson
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i   +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Ross Finlayson
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i   `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Python
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i    `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Ross Finlayson
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i   i     `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i   `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation38Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii i    `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation37Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i     +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation35Python
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation5Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     ii`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Python
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     ii `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     ii  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Python
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     ii   `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation29Paul.B.Andersen
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation28Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation27Paul.B.Andersen
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i   +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i   i`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i   +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i   +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
4 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i   `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation22Richard Hachel
4 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i    `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation21Paul.B.Andersen
4 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i     +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i     +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i     +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i     i`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Paul.B.Andersen
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i     `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation16Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i      `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation15Paul.B.Andersen
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation7Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Paul.B.Andersen
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       ii`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       ii `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Python
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       ii  `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Mikko
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       i `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
5 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i       `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation6Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i        +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i        i`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i        +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i        i`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24 i i   ii i     i        `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   ii i     `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i   ii  `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Maciej Wozniak
1 Sep 24 i i   i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation16Thomas Heger
1 Sep 24 i i   i +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation14Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   i i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Mikko
1 Sep 24 i i   i ii`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Richard Hachel
3 Sep 24 i i   i ii `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Mikko
3 Sep 24 i i   i ii  `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   i i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation9Thomas Heger
2 Sep 24 i i   i i +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation6Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   i i i+- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Maciej Wozniak
3 Sep 24 i i   i i i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Thomas Heger
4 Sep 24 i i   i i i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Thomas Heger
4 Sep 24 i i   i i i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Python
5 Sep 24 i i   i i i   `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Thomas Heger
2 Sep 24 i i   i i +- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
2 Sep 24 i i   i i `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   i `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
31 Aug 24 i i   `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
24 Aug 24 i `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Mikko
23 Aug 24 +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation15J. J. Lodder
23 Aug 24 i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation14Richard Hachel
24 Aug 24 i +* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation12gharnagel
24 Aug 24 i i+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation7Richard Hachel
24 Aug 24 i ii+- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1gharnagel
24 Aug 24 i ii+* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Paul.B.Andersen
24 Aug 24 i iii`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Richard Hachel
25 Aug 24 i iii `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Paul.B.Andersen
25 Aug 24 i iii  `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Maciej Wozniak
25 Aug 24 i ii`- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Python
1 Sep 24 i i`* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation4Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation3Paul.B.Andersen
1 Sep 24 i i  `* Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation2Richard Hachel
1 Sep 24 i i   `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Paul.B.Andersen
25 Aug 24 i `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Mikko
3 Sep 24 `- Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation1Athel Cornish-Bowden

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal