Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation

On 09/01/2024 11:22 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 09/01/2024 10:38 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:

Le 01/09/2024 à 19:20, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

Den 01.09.2024 16:13, skrev Richard Hachel:

>

Why didn't you calculate  calculate t₂ with the wrong speed of light?
Is the equation t₂ = (d/v)⋅√(1−v²/c²) beyond your mathematical
capabilities?

>
Vr=Vo/sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)
>
Vr=4c/3
>
t₂=x/Vr=0.75sec
>
R.H.
>
>
>
>
>
>

>
Yet, if you square that, then take the root,
is it not that triangle inequality replaces 0.25?
>
The difference?
>
>
This is a large part of when things are squared
or stored in roots for no reason then as with
regards to that as an indicator, or "dimension",
where a "dimension" only needs one bit an "indicator",
triangle rule the bit indicator for the quadrant,
that in these things making numerical emergence
for continuity, it's often the most usual rule
any matters of direction, "what 0.75 means".
>
It's like "power law" or "normal distribution",
"sure, it fits".
>
>

 "Centralizing tendency"