Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years.

What did relativity provide to physics in 100 years, as it was
hyper-hyped by generations of physicists covered with more than generous
publicity by scientific journals and academia?
1. Even when Einstein was UNABLE to prove in 7 attempts (1905-1946), it
was ADOPTED that E=mc2 is true. Very convenient for the simplification
of units of measure in physics and chemistry. IT´S FALSE. Just a
convention.
2. That inertia (mass) increase with velocity significantly, above
v>0.3c. IT´S FALSE, and is mostly abandoned concept since late 1990s.
Only a few physicists and school science's teacher persist on this. With
dubious methods, and ONLY for charged particles and ions, it was
believed to be true by using particle accelerators of many kinds. After
all the efforts to prove it experimentally, the concept was abandoned to
favor the increase of kinetic energy, while the concept of resting mass
was kept due to the use of E=mc2.
Still, even TODAY, the rest energy of an electron is calculated (and
written in stone) as 0.511 Ev. BUT the problem for the geniuses out
there is that the mass of an electron is IRREDUCIBLE, as it's an
elementary particle that figures in the Standard Model.
And still today, not a single proof of this applied to non-charged
particles, atoms, etc. Electromagnetic influence is strongly neglected
in particle physics and in the behavior of the Universe and
constituents.
3. That Mercury's perihelion extra-advance (beyond Newtonian celestial
mechanics) is due to the distortion of spacetime (another invention),
caused by the mass of the Sun. This was taken as PROVEN theoretically by
Einstein (Nov. 1915), after three consecutive years of very gross
failures (with Besso and Grossman). The trick was to GET RID of ALL the
celestial bodies, except Mercury and the Sun, using a lame and incorrect
approach that TAKES FOR GRANTED the contribution of the remaining
planets and satellites,CALCULATED (not measured), using a 100 years
theory (Gauss annular approach for each planet's mass). This is a MIX of
both Newtonian physics and GR manipulation. Nobody acknowledge that this
is FALSE and unscientific, even today. Plus, Einstein integral in the
1915 paper was incorrect, as it didn't take account that perigee and
apogee of Mercury were changing while integrating. But most scientists
endorsed this nonsense.
4. That gravity bends light. This scam, perpetuated by the Anglo-Saxon
establishment and media, lives in infamy, as it was NEVER PROVED in
1919-1920, nor even until today (Shapiro and other degenerates using
statistical averages). Yet, even when the phenomena of deflection by
large celestial bodies can be explained by using the mathematics of
optical effects (350 years old), the current narrative exploit this to
expand its use to Black Holes (another crap derived from a singular GR
solution), mass of galaxies, etc.
5. That gravity causes red/blue shifting of light. IT´S FALSE and was
never proven, not even close. Yet, it's sustained that such conjecture
is the explanation of the success of GPS and other GNSS.
6. Academia is deaf and blind about 100 years of controversies.
Antagonists or critics of relativity, even the most credible scholars,
are threatened to be CANCELLED (cease and desist or else).
In this world of lies, the fairy tale of relativity is just ONE MORE
subject that is supported at all costs.