Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.

W dniu 05.09.2024 o 08:57, Thomas Heger pisze:

Am Mittwoch000004, 04.09.2024 um 23:10 schrieb Python:

Le 04/09/2024 à 23:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 04.09.2024 o 21:30, Python pisze:

Le 04/09/2024 à 20:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 04.09.2024 o 19:48, gharnagel pisze:

On Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:09:57 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
Common sense was warning your idiot guru.

>
St. John the Divine was warning Warped Wozniak, the
bald-faced liar:

>
>
St John (fuck his absurd threats anyway) won't
help,  t'=t in GPS,  at least if by t, t' we
mean clock  indications.

>
How such t and t' are clock indications.

>
According to the own definition of
your [Einstein] - time is "what clocks
indicate",

>
Don't be lazy, Wozniak, read! "time is "what clocks indicate" is

 This is wrong!
 Time does not depend on clocks, because clocks are manmade artifacts.

Are they? And so is time, except that it is
an abstract.

Essentially the concept of time depends on a process of counting something, which is assumed to happen always at the same rate.

Newton's concept of time was already some
mystical bullshit. But his time was similar
to the real one enough to make the models basing
on it - usable. Einstein's time is just mystical
bullshit of no real use.

So, essentially some sort of 'atomic clock' ist constructed and used, which defines, how long a second is and what time we have right now.
 But still nature doesn't care.

It doesn't.