Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation

Le 06/09/2024 à 12:31, Thomas Heger a écrit :

 The relevant coordinate system can now be attatched to A or B, depending on where the observer is placed.
 So: the coordinate system K is placed, that its center coincides with 'A', while the certer of K' coincides with B.
 (the primed version of A and B make no sense, hence could be left away).
 Now we have two systems K and K' which both receed from an imaginary point in the center (called 'M', for simpility), which is assumed to be not moving.
 This would mean, that A would receed from M by v=0.8c and from B with 1,6 c, hence drops out of the realm of visiblity, because the image of A gets redshifted below the value 0 Hz, if seen from the remote side (here B).
 But, nevertheless, both (A and B) could remain well and good, because who cares about distant observers, which you cannot see?
 ...

Oh my god!
This is where I see the criminal behavior and efficiency of all the anti-Hachel morons who are on the forums and try to rot everything he has to say.
If I were allowed to speak, and if what I say was accepted, not only would the RR be simpler and fairer for the Nobel Prize winners (unable to speak as well as I do), but in addition, such sentences full of misunderstandings would not exist.
Saint Paul already said it in the time of Jesus Christ:
"By rejecting Hachel, physicists are therefore fully responsible for the crimes and offenses committed against science, because having been able to recognize Richard Hachel as their God, they did not want to recognize him as God, preferring to lose the normal use of women to fuck each other, with lousy concepts, and imaginary and false equations".
It is always the same waters that flow.
Man remains man, sunk in these hominid ideologies.
R.H.