On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 5:24:14 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 05:34, gharnagel pisze:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:24:02 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
[Wozniak's post is a meandering piece of
nonsense]
>
He will not take any responsibility for his
lies, backtracking and misinformation.
>
As expected from a relativistic piece of
shit - you're projecting your own lies,
backtracking and disinformation on me;
and your lack of responsibility as
well.
Mimicry is an infantile response, but that's
all Wozniak can do.
t'=t remains valid for GPS and
the mumble of your idiot guru remains
inconsistent.
Truculent Wozniak is reduced to repeating his
lies, which is not a valid response to the
information he has received:
Congenital-liar Wozzie-fool doesn't realize that GR deals
with dt' and dt, as I showed him, but he's too much of an
ignoramus to understand. Consequently, he just keeps
repeating his stale old lies, hoping to deceive everyone.
He's been doing this for years but it doesn't work. His
arch enemy has pointed out what his insane behavior implies:
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and
expecting different results." -- Albert Einstein
"The satellite clocks were designed to run slow (dt')
in orbit so they would appear to run normally as
measured from the ground (dt). All the clocks on
earth are essentially in the same frame (dt), so
Wozzie-liar is being deceitful when he falsely
presumes that dt' refers to another clock on the
ground. It's not, dt' refers to the clock on the
satellite measured AT the satellite, not what it
reads from the ground. Wozzie-liar is fundamentally
dishonest."
So his dishonest claim that t' = t is a bald-faced
lie. He doesn't have access to the clocks in the
satellite (t') nor the clocks in GPS stations on
the ground (t), so he cannot prove that t' = t,
he is only consulting his flimsy prejudice. The
experimental evidence refutes his lies:
https://phys.org/news/2010-09-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal.html#:~:text=The%20aluminum%20clocks%20can%20detect%20small%20relativity-based%20effects,James%20Chin-Wen%20Chou%2C%20first%20author%20of%20the%20paper.
which I posted previously but Wozniak dishonestly
deleted because it blew up his demented agenda
like the house of cards that it is.