Re: Why relativity is a pseudoscience? First approach.

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:05:48 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

>
Den 10.09.2024 07:42, skrev rhertz:

>
WHY THE ASSERTION ABOUT RELATIVITY BEING A PSEUDOSCIENCE? THE

FOLLOWING

APPLY:
>
1) As the distance between both reference frames is increasing
constantly, the communication of data between both frames is

IMPOSSIBLE

to exist while exchanging information about time and position of both
frames, even using light as a carrier of data. Both origins will be
always out of sync, even when ghost observers, located at both

origins,

are trying to communicate between them.
>

>
Hilarious, no? :-D
>

Indeed :-))
To know the position and velocity of a moving object, NASA has a "magic"
technology:  They send two EM pulses that are returned after arriving at
the object.  From that they know the position and velocity of the object
at two particular times in the past.  Since the velocity is specified to
be constant, they know the position at any time, past, present or
future.
Hertz is not a rocket scientist.

2) Therefore, the only way to PRETEND that remote data (x,t, x', t')

is

KNOWN, is by using a couple of formulae (Lorentz, Poincaré), TO

COMPUTE

at each frame time and position of the other frame.
This is THE FATAL CONCEPTUAL ERROR OF RELATIVITY.

“Don’t think too much.  You’ll create a problem that wasn’t even
there in the first place.” – Anon.

Using Lorentz transforms introduces (ARTIFICIALLY: just mathematics),

a

NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR of space and time, which is a mere function of the
differential velocity v.
>
>
Due to this, remote sensing IS IMPOSSIBLE, because both frames are

being

increasingly separated, and remote sensing is always out of sync.
Considering that the CORE of special relativity is that (Lorentz),

time

and space ARE DIFFERENT at each frame, a valid exchange of information
(x,t, x', t') between observers at both frames IS ABSOLUTELY

IMPOSSIBLE.

“There is no point in using the word 'impossible' to describe something
that has clearly happened.” – Douglas Adams

So, the ONLY CHANCE that an observer at any frame has, in order to

know

time and space value AT THE OTHER FRAME is TO BELIEVE that mathematics
(not observations) give the desired answers.

>
Absolutely beautiful, Richard.
Your sense of humour has really evolved during your
absence from this forum!

NASA believes that their magic technology works, so they haven't
destroyed
a lot of their spacecraft, unlike countries that don't believe :-)