Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.

W dniu 10.09.2024 o 22:30, Python pisze:

Le 10/09/2024 à 22:15, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 10.09.2024 o 21:34, Python pisze:

Le 10/09/2024 à 19:24, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:55, gharnagel pisze:

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 16:32, gharnagel pisze:

>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 5:24:14 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>
As expected from a relativistic piece of
shit - you're projecting your own lies,
backtracking and disinformation on me;
and your lack of responsibility as
well.

>
Mimicry is an infantile response, but that's
all Wozniak can do.

>
I can also present a proof that the mumble
of your idiot guru was not even consistent.

>
Wozzie-liar's baseless ass-insertion has been
refuted by logical argument and measurement.

>
Neither you, nor your fellow trash presented
any. Just ravings, insults and slanders, typical
for relativistic scum.
>
>

"The satellite clocks were designed to run slow
(dt') in orbit so they would appear to run
normally as measured from the ground (dt).

>
And their indications -  t and t' - are equal.

>
Wozzie-liar keeps insisting this is so without
even a single measurement as proof.

>
Harrie-liar keeps insisting they're not, but
asked about numbers he only responds with a
stream  of ravings,

>
You are right! Let me correct his answers then:

>
I'll gladly let you, and remind the question too,
poor stinker. When t (the clock indication in a
ground GPS base) is 2024-09-12 17:00:00.0000000, t'
(the clock indication in a GPS satellite) will be...?
Choose any base, any satellite and consider the
simultaneity of the base.
What is your answer, poor stinker? Let me guess:
some usual  slanders about my bottles of  vodka,
as expected from a relativistic piece of shit.
>
>

 As "Doctor Hachel" do, do you believe that "3 = 4 for some observers" ?

Your bunch of idiots has refuted the rules of
basic  geometry  - why would the rules of
basic arithmetics be any better, poor stinker?