Sujet : Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 11. Sep 2024, 06:05:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17f4182ee2b8f4df$197486$787920$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 23:27, Python pisze:
Le 10/09/2024 à 18:52, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:40, Python pisze:
Le 10/09/2024 à 18:33, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 17:55, Python pisze:
Le 10/09/2024 à 17:33, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze:
Le 10/09/2024 à 16:59, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
... I can also present a proof that the [SR] of
[Einstein] was not even consistent.
>
No you cannot.
>
I've pointed directly 2 denying themself predictions of [SR]
>
No, you haven't.
>
...
I did nothing of that kind. Instead I debunked your claims.
>
Sorry, poor stinker, your moronic slanders of my bottles of vodka
are debunking nothing.
>
Nothing of that kind either. Sorry ;-p read again.
>
Absolutely something of that kind. Sorry, read again, poor stinker.
« The point is that neither Relativity or Newtonian Dynamics
rely on such definitions [of a second].
So posting such definitions would be as relevant as posting
And - the bottles of vodka! Similarly idiotic
and baseless assertions.