Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 11. Sep 2024, 18:00:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <a997391ef57920834c6005baf1c981fd@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:24:31 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 18:55, gharnagel pisze:
>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:59:41 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
I can also present a proof that the mumble
of your idiot guru was not even consistent.
>
Wozzie-liar's baseless ass-insertion has been
refuted by logical argument and measurement.
>
Neither you, nor your fellow trash presented
any.
https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
Bailey et al., "Measurements of relativistic time
dilation for positive and negative muons in a
circular orbit," Nature 268 (July 28, 1977) pg 301.
Bailey et al., Nuclear Physics B 150 pg 1–79 (1979).
Sherwin, "Some Recent Experimental Tests of the 'Clock
Paradox'", Phys. Rev. 129 no. 1 (1960), pg 17.
Bender et al., Science 182 (1973), pg 229.  "The corner
reflectors placed on the moon by the Apollo astronauts
are used to verify GR with a net accuracy of 15 cm in
the telescope-to-reflector distance."

Just ravings, insults and slanders, typical
for relativistic scum.
Says dishonest Wozzie-liar as he ravesm spits, insults
and slanders :-))

And their indications -  t and t' - are equal.
>
Wozzie-liar keeps insisting this is so without
even a single measurement as proof.
>
Harrie-liar keeps insisting they're not, but
asked about numbers he only responds with
The truth:
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2010/09/nist-pair-aluminum-atomic-clocks-reveal-einsteins-relativity-personal-scale
"In one set of experiments, scientists raised
one of the clocks by jacking up the laser table
to a height one-third of a meter (about a foot)
above the second clock. Sure enough, the higher
clock ran at a slightly faster rate than the
lower clock, exactly as predicted.
"The second set of experiments examined the
effects of altering the physical motion of the
ion in one clock. (The ions are almost
completely motionless during normal clock
operations.) NIST scientists tweaked the one
ion so that it gyrated back and forth at speeds
equivalent to several meters per second. That
clock ticked at a slightly slower rate than the
second clock, as predicted by relativity."
So lazy lying Wozzie-fool could have read all
of this for himself and learned some real
information, but he prefers to pathologically
lie, spit, rave, insult and slander.
“A person who won’t read has no advantage over
one who can’t read.” – Mark Twain

a stream  of ravings, insults and slanders.
says the raving, spitting, insulting and
slandering Wozzie-hypocrite :-))

Lies have short legs.
The truth must, therefore, have long legs.
I have long legs and Wozzie-liar has feet
directly connected to his hips.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Sep 24 * Yes, t'=t in GPS.60Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.59Python
4 Sep 24  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.58Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.57gharnagel
4 Sep 24    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.56Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.14Python
4 Sep 24     i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.13Maciej Wozniak
4 Sep 24     i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.12Python
5 Sep 24     i  +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10Thomas Heger
5 Sep 24     i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24     i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Thomas Heger
6 Sep 24     i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24     i      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Thomas Heger
13 Sep 24     i        +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
13 Sep 24     i        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24     i         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Thomas Heger
14 Sep 24     i          `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
5 Sep 24     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.41gharnagel
5 Sep 24      +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
5 Sep 24      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.39gharnagel
5 Sep 24       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.38Maciej Wozniak
6 Sep 24        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.37gharnagel
6 Sep 24         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.36Maciej Wozniak
7 Sep 24          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.35gharnagel
7 Sep 24           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.34Maciej Wozniak
8 Sep 24            `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.33gharnagel
8 Sep 24             `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.32Maciej Wozniak
9 Sep 24              `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.31gharnagel
10 Sep 24               `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.30gharnagel
10 Sep 24                `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.29gharnagel
10 Sep 24                 `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.28Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8Python
10 Sep 24                  i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Python
10 Sep 24                  i  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                  i    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  i     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Python
11 Sep 24                  i      `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                  `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.19gharnagel
10 Sep 24                   `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.18Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Python
10 Sep 24                    i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6Maciej Wozniak
10 Sep 24                    i +* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4Python
10 Sep 24                    i i+- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Maciej Wozniak
11 Sep 24                    i i`* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.2Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24                    i i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
10 Sep 24                    i `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Python
11 Sep 24                    `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.10gharnagel
11 Sep 24                     `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.9Maciej Wozniak
12 Sep 24                      `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.8gharnagel
12 Sep 24                       `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.7Maciej Wozniak
13 Sep 24                        `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.6gharnagel
13 Sep 24                         `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.5Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                          `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.4gharnagel
14 Sep 24                           `* Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.3Maciej Wozniak
14 Sep 24                            +- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1Richard Hachel
15 Sep 24                            `- Re: Yes, t'=t in GPS.1gharnagel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal