Sujet : Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity.
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 11. Sep 2024, 21:03:40
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <rJGdnQy18fYEanz7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 09/09/2024 01:58 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
Paul:
"Elegance and truth are inversely related." -- Becker's Razor
>
What is the basis in physics for the 2 in 2GM? There is none. Then, it
is a baseless prediction.
(re-sent, re-sent)
There's mathematics it's got "doubling spaces" and "doubling measures"
as with regards to the quasi-invariance in measure theory and the
measure problem which is inherently a feature of continuum
mechanics, if the super-classical extra-standard continuum mechanics.
Then "why 2, arbitrarily", "why 1/2", like "why are these stress and
strain tensors then Green and Cauchy then Euler and Gauss/Dirac",
tensors, and it's a concession to continuum mechanics, into
Piola-Kirchhoff, tensors. Also it shows up in Fourier, Dirichlet, and Fejer.