Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 12. Sep 2024, 18:08:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <BIUu7kHEMIlpD2H5wj8fSw5s4sI@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 12/09/2024 à 17:32, Python a écrit :
Le 12/09/2024 à 16:41, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
Le 12/09/2024 à 16:00, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
 This is the statement I responded to.
 It was YOU who introduced Stella's view ("for Stella").
You even called it "the key to the paradox" and "the brilliant explanation".
If Stella shall return to Terrence, she _must_ accelerate during
her journey, so Stella's frame is always an accelerated frame of reference (in flat spacetime).
 But it isn't beautiful, even if it true.
 Stella's view is rather pointless.
 As I said:
Nothing happens to Terrence clock, it runs normally.
It is _only_ Stella's idea of what is simultaneous that
make it appear that Terrence clock run fast.
 If you change Stella's path in Terrence frame a little,
Stella's view of Terrence may change it a lot, because
Stella's idea of what is simultaneous changes.
(You can change the path without changing Stella's and Terrence's proper times.)
 If we describes the "twin paradox" in Terrence's inertial frame,
Stella's view adds nothing of interest.
 So we can do without Stella's view of Terrence.
It is certainly not "the key to the paradox".
 
 t'es vraiment con comme un balai : tu as foutu toute ta "réponse" en ... signature.
 you are stupid as stone: you put your entire "answer" in ... your signature.
 Trump is inspiring you, I'd say :-)
Trump 2024 !!!
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Sep 24 * Langevin and Doppler effects...25Richard Hachel
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Python
6 Sep 24 i`- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
6 Sep 24 +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...18Paul.B.Andersen
6 Sep 24 i`* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...17Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...16Paul.B.Andersen
7 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...15Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24 i   +- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
9 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...13Paul.B.Andersen
9 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...12Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...11Paul.B.Andersen
11 Sep 24 i      +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Python
11 Sep 24 i      i`- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i      +- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel
11 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...7Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...6Paul.B.Andersen
12 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...5Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i         +* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...3Python
12 Sep 24 i         i`* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2Richard Hachel
12 Sep 24 i         i `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Python
12 Sep 24 i         `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Paul.B.Andersen
7 Sep 24 `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...4ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Sep 24  `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...3Richard Hachel
7 Sep 24   `* Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
7 Sep 24    `- Re: Langevin and Doppler effects...1Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal