Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

One important thing, which clearly shows the FARCE, are the stability
numbers for rubidium atomic clocks.
Very simply:
- Flying eastwards during 41 hours, and measuring a total difference of
59 nsec IMPLY a factor of 4E-13 in terms of ACCURACY.
- Flying westward during 65 hours, and measuring a total difference with
the ground clock of 270 nsec IMPLY a factor of 1.2E-12 in terms of
ACCURACY.
Have in mind that THREE RUBIDIUM ATOMIC CLOCKS (from 1971) were FAR from
the stability and accuracy of modern clocks, 50 years after (like this
one):
https://www.microsemi.com/document-portal/doc_view/133195-rubidium-keeps-the-signal-stable
Accuracy: +/- 5E-11
Age degradation: 5E-11/month
OR THESE ONE:
Stability and Noise Performance of Various Rubidium Standards
http://www.ke5fx.com/rb.htm
As ANYONE CAN SEE, the stability (1 sec) for several modern rubidium
clocks are 10 to 100 LOWER!! THAN the gross accuracy that the pair of
crooks published in 1972 (curiously 1 year after the original
publication, that had not such data).
How come did HK obtain such accuracy IF NOT BY TWO FACTORS:
1. They considered that lectors are gullible imbeciles and/or
accomplishes of this HOAX. After all, the US Naval Observatory gave them
$8,000 to pay the tickets, and facilitated the atomic clocks (running on
battery).
2. They cooked the data HEAVILY, dismissing crucial parameters like:
- Segmented flight path, far from linear circumvention of Earth at
Equator in just one segment.
- Accelerations, decelerations, different altitudes, heat, humidity,
electromagnetic influences, time involved on the ground, between flight
paths and more than 1 week before the east and west flights.
-Shocks suffered by manipulations at each segment, when the clocks were
loaded and unloaded from the planes and the time the clocks spent in
LOCAL, not acclimatized or blinded airport storage.
- NOT REVEALING HOW COME DID THEY MEASURED TIME ELAPSED IN NANOSECONDS
IN 1971. What that the IMPOSSIBLE CASE that the clocks had 12 digits
digital counters (nanoseconds displayed?) OR they just EXTRAPOLATED THE
DATA FROM THE REGULAR 5Mhz or 10 Mhz of these clocks (as it happens
since HP created the first one)?
FISHY EXPERIMENT. A HOAX PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC IN TIMES THAT THE HYPE
ABOUT EINSTEIN HAD REVIVED?
Dishonest people looking for fame and money (for the US military and
academic labs), and ethically rotten to the core.