Sujet : Re: The definition of "when"
De : mlwozniak (at) *nospam* wp.pl (Maciej Wozniak)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 13. Sep 2024, 05:29:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-ID : <17f4b35c1d241738$1188524$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
W dniu 12.09.2024 o 07:50, Maciej Wozniak pisze:
W dniu 10.09.2024 o 23:25, Python pisze:
>
> Define "when" please. We can. You haven't.
You say you can. I say you're lying, as
expected from a poor relativistic stinker.
Let's check. Will we?
Let S - a satalite of GPS. One, chosen.
B - a GPS ground base. One, chosen.
ES, EB - sets of events in S,B
e1 - an event from ES, e2 - an event from EB.
Propose a method of determining whether
e1 and e2 are simultaneous - according to
an observer from B. A method, of course,
fitting The Shit you worship.
Will I have to apologize for "you're lying",
poor stinker?
No answer? Of course.
Re: The definition of "when"