The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,
De : hertz778 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (rhertz)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 15. Sep 2024, 03:26:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <55dd6d7aedf3d92af90dfb33b2854ef5@www.novabbs.com>
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Since 1911, Einstein and relativistic heirs have been rotting physics
with the fairy tale about gravity affecting time shown in any kind of
clocks (mechanical, quartz based and atomic clocks).
In particular, and derived from 110 years old Schwarzchild's solution to
a VERY BASIC PROBLEM, it has been widely spread between relativistic
circles that ANY CLOCK raised to ANY HEIGHT above ground presents a time
or frequency difference (gravitational blue shift, from Schwarzschild
metric) of:
Δf/f = (GMe/c²) (1/R - 1/a) , where R is the Earth's radius and "a" is
the height of the clock above ground.
The above equation came from 1911 Einstein's paper, ratified later in
1915 through GR, that THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL Φ = -GMe/R affects EM
radiation by a factor Φ/c², increasing its energy (as the clock is
raised) to a value of  Eo (1 + Φ/c²), where Eo is the energy at ground
level.
In simpler terms, the gravitational potential gained by a raised object
is POTENTIAL ENERGY, which affects
measured time (allegedly) if the object is a clock.
Now, the AWFUL TRUTH that every single blind and deaf relativist CHOOSE
TO IGNORE:
1. EVERY SINGLE SATELLITE IN STABLE ORBIT (MANNED OR NOT) HAS
MICROGRAVITY WITHIN IT, WHICH AFFECTS EVERYTHING INSIDE THE SATELLITE,
EITHER LIVE FORMS OR ARTIFACTS.
2, FOR ANY PRACTICAL CASE, ARTIFACTS LIKE CLOCKS OPERATE AS IF g = ZERO,
DUE TO CENTRIPENTAL FORCES THAT ARE EQUAL TO GRAVITATIONAL FORCES (that
would make them to fall to Earth).
THIS IS PHYSICALLY EQUIVALENT TO THE CASE OF A MIRROR OF EARTH PLACED AT
EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE CENTER OF EARTH, BUT LOCATED ABOVE OF THE
SATELLITE (R vs. -R, referenced to the satellite).
THEREFORE, THE GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ACTING UPON ANY ONBOARD CLOCK IS
ZERO (MICROGRAVITY).
Due to the above concepts, any onboard clock CAN'T BE AFFECTED BY
GRAVITY, SO SCHWARZCHILD'S SOLUTION IS FALSE WITH RESPECT TO GR EFFECTS.
Only IF such clock would be at the top of a very long pole above the
surface, and not moving at all, using the alleged effects of the
gravitational (potential) energy would be correct in terms of GR.
The only remaining effect for an orbiting satellite, would be the STUPID
TIME DILATION due to its motion.
So, for all of the above, the relativists supporting the crap of
relativity effects on clocks orbiting Earth have to redefine the stupid
theory. Better yet, abandon physics and start a career as gardeners.
As if the above IS NOT ENOUGH, exhaustive experiments done by France
since 2017 SHOWS (with error <10E-15) that THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
BREAKS AT QUANTUM LEVEL.
As they wrote here:
https://www.oca.eu/en/news-lagrange/1363-first-results-from-microscope-satellite-confirm-albert-einstein-s-theory-of-relativity-with-unprecedented-precision
QUOTE:
«The satellite’s performance is far exceeding expectations. Data from
more than 1,900 additional orbits are already available and more are to
come, which should enable us to further improve the mission’s
performance and approach its target of acquiring measurements with a
precision of 10-15. This first result is going to shake the world of
physics and will certainly lead to a revision of alternative theories to
general relativity,» said the mission’s principal investigator Pierre
Touboul.
Enjoy slowly, relativists. Please don't choke on your stupidity, as you
are allowed to fail for being just humans.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Sep 24 * The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,15rhertz
15 Sep 24 +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 +* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,8Paul.B.Andersen
15 Sep 24 i+- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Maciej Wozniak
15 Sep 24 i+- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Ross Finlayson
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
18 Sep 24 i +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,3gharnagel
22 Sep 24 i  `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,2ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
22 Sep 24 i   `- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Ross Finlayson
16 Sep 24 +* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,2Volney
16 Sep 24 i`- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Maciej Wozniak
21 Sep 24 `* Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,3rhertz
21 Sep 24  +- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1Paul.B.Andersen
21 Sep 24  `- Re: The HOAX of GR effects in GPS and other artificial satellites,1J. J. Lodder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal