Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Le 17/09/2024 à 20:23, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :

Mr. Hertz: Only a complete fool would consider it credible at all.
Radwan M. Kassir is an excellent critic of relativist math in his book,
"Mathematical Conflicts in the Special Theory of Relativity," Third
Edition.

If we push the mathematics of SR a little, and not much, we realize that it does not hold up for a single instant, and that we find ourselves in terrible absurdities.
But the most dramatic thing is not there, I have always said it: the most dramatic thing is the fanatical belief in lousy mathematical concepts.
I am always surprised that no mathematician has ever shattered this true theory, but explained by crazy physicists.
What is crazier than physicists who, telling us, that there is a contraction of distances, that is to say that in Stella's frame of reference (Langevin) the distance traveled on Stella's return is not 12 ly, but 7.2 ly.
Except that her proper time is 9 years. Which they admit.
Except that it is fixed in its frame of reference, and that it observes the earth approaching it with an apparent speed of 4c.
Except that the fact of observing for 9 years a body moving with an apparent speed of a speed of 4c, has never made that x = Vapp.tau = 7.2 al.
What to answer to Doctor Hachel? Nothing.
This is how from half-false, the theory of special relativity becomes sordid.
Adding human arrogance to an imperfectly understood theory,
when theorists mastering their subject show its few imperfections and misunderstandings, is sordid.
R.H.