Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Le 17/09/2024 à 23:54, Python a écrit :

Le 17/09/2024 à 22:52, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 17/09/2024 à 21:58, Python a écrit :
 

What is crazier than physicists who, telling us, that there is a contraction of distances, that is to say that in Stella's frame of reference (Langevin) the distance traveled on Stella's return is not 12 ly, but 7.2 ly.
 Except that her proper time is 9 years. Which they admit.
 Except that it is fixed in its frame of reference, and that it observes the earth approaching it with an apparent speed of 4c.
 Except that the fact of observing for 9 years a body moving with an apparent speed of a speed of 4c, has never made that x = Vapp.tau = 7.2 al.
 What to answer to Doctor Hachel? Nothing.

 Je cite Python :  

<http://nemoweb.net/jntp?KeMng-htXJYDukgVPkyAXjMEQpI@jntp/Data.Media:1>

 

This is definitely not "nothing" :-)

  IL faudrait quand même que certains posteurs cessent de dire n'importe quoi.
 Cela devient lassant.
 R.H.

 Check by yourself. You'll notice that I'm right :-)

As expressed in the context that Dr. Lengrand didn't quote my article: when both events are the starting/ending ones of a *full* inertial segment
the condition is not satisfied for the *full* return segment.
On the other hand this condition *is true* for any "small enough" segment
either on both part of the round-trip. Again, this is explicitely written.
I used to wonder if Hachel/Lengrand really missed the point, but given
how systematically he is ignoring *that very point* I started to wonder
if he's not just a fucking hypocrite.
I think he is :-P
Ignoring basic geometry is not a solution Richard...