Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 2:30:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>

http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/HK50/1971-PTTI-Vol-03_17.pdf

>
The above had been written BEFORE their full analysis using the
method of correlated rate-change analysis, which I described earlier.
So yes, the initial analysis did not look all that great, but the
full analysis making use of all of the inter-comparison data was
able to resolve the clock glitches.
>
Nowadays, cesium clocks have far greater stability, and convincing
results can be obtained using single clocks on short flights
and WITHOUT any sophisticated data analysis.
http://resource.npl.co.uk/docs/publications/newsletters/metromnia/issue18_einstein.pdf
>
>
Why do you keep attempting to knock down the H&K experiment?