Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

CORRECTION TO MY POST ABOVE (a single mistake):
H-K used FOUR ATOMIC CLOCKS (two for eastward flights and another two
for the westward flights).
Once the eastward flights finished, the first two HP 5060 A were
dispatched to the lab at Washington D.C.
H&K waited for one week to receive and accommodate A NEW PAIR of HP 5060
A Cs atomic clocks, before starting the westward flights.
I figured out this once I posted above, when thinking why they invested
one week between flights.
So, my correction is: Both segments (east, west) could be measured
separately.
What remains is the core of the hoax: They invested about 1 year (1972)
to publish the TOTAL DIFFERENCE, but they hadn't any means to
communicate data in real time, so the differences could be computed
second by second, if you will.
It's similar to the case of GPS, as the time differences (or frequency)
between satellites and ground stations CAN´T (WON´T) be known in real
time. Actually, this could happen by using digital encoding and
transmissions, which would be an undisputed proof of SR/GR. But this is
not happening FOR A REASON.