Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Lawrance, thanks for your support and understanding of my later posts.
*************************************************************************
Mr. Hertz: Then, they primarily relied on the clock readings at the
beginning and end of the experiment compared with the reference clocks,
allowing the possibility of errors at intervening intervals from various
causes. Thus, they lack the comparisons with reference clocks at each
significant interval that may be telling. It was, overall, a very
inaccurate experiment.
*************************************************************************
You got it almost right.
The pair of clocks used in the eastward segment accumulated the entire
difference
when they were sent to Washington (alleged eastward + westward travels).
The second pair of clocks, used for the final westward trip had ONLY
such alleged
time difference, so they only had the alleged difference of the return
trip to Washington.
Consider that the second pair of HP 5060 A were sent with POWER OFF, so
they didn't have
the eastward alleged difference (this is my reasoning).
To turn on an HP 5060 A Cs atomic clock, it's necessary to warm them up
for more than 24 hours,
so they could reach a stable state. For this, and another reasons, H & K
had to wait 1 week to
begin the westward flight to Washington (like waiting the clocks to
arrive to the Far East location).
Another INCONVENIENCE was at WHICH TIME did they set both clocks, once
the warm-up was finished.
They HAD NO MEANS to synchronize the second pair with the reference pair
at Washington D.C.
This introduces ANOTHER INCOGNITO in such fishy experiment, because they
couldn't set the time with
MORE THAN 1 SECOND ACCURACY. Forget then that they had the chance to get
sync AT THE NANOSECOND LEVEL.
So, the STATISTICAL MANIPULATION OF DATA IS EXTRAORDINARY, but you don't
read about these "problems"
ANYWHERE at their publications.
Because Hafele and the representant of the US Naval Observatory WANTED
THAT THE MANUFACTURED DATA
verified Einstein's theories of SR/GR.
I hope that the above clarifications can explain, crystal clear, why I
called the experiment AN HOAX.
Of course, DENIAL is a very strong attitude. You'll see how relativists
jump to post ANY ABSURD EXCUSE
in order to make such crappy experiment a triumph of Einstein's
theories, as it has been happening every time since WWII ended. Another
FRAUD is the Pound-Rebka experiment using gamma rays from 57Fe (1961).
ALL THE EXPERIMENTS PROVING THAT EINSTEIN'S GR IS CORRECT ARE JUST PLAIN
FRAUD surrounded by complicity of the specialized media and relativist
academia.
Why? I have a very clear opinion, which I sustained for the last 5 years
on the other forum.