Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX,

Den 20.09.2024 21:28, skrev rhertz:

 And about that my calculation took more than 1 circulation around the
globe (39,658 Km instead of 36,900 Km following the Equator).

In your example the aircraft was flying non stop at 900 km/s.
In that case the trip in either direction would take 44.4 hours and:
East going clock:
(τ - τ₀) = -1.638E-12⋅159869 s = -240 ns
That's OK
----------
BUT THIS is your error, or rather an absolute ridiculous remark:
| Richard Hertz wrote:> Accumulating 65 hours flying eastward, it gives
|>
|> (τ - τ₀) = -383.2 nanoseconds
|> for a full eastward flight around the globe.
|>
|> But Hafele published a theoretical SR value of -184 ± 18 nsec, which is
|> almost half the value I calculated using his formula for SR.
If the aircraft was flying non stop at 900 km/h for 65 hours then:
(τ - τ₀) = -383.2 ns
This is correct even if the aircraft would have flown more
than once around the Earth.
Your absolute ridiculous remark was this:
"But Hafele published a theoretical SR value of -184 ± 18 nsec,
  which is almost half the value I calculated using his formula for SR."
Do I have to explain why? (You don't seem to have got it!)
You are claiming that SR's prediction for the Eastward trip,
consisting of a number of flights and stops between the flights,
should be -383.2 ns.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/