Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.physics
Date : 23. Sep 2024, 17:31:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <e7e8sk-ai5m.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-122-generic (x86_64))
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 22.09.2024 o 22:18, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
W dniu 22.09.2024 o 21:02, Jim Pennino pisze:
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:52:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:49:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 2:55:50 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:19:24 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
>
https://www.facebook.com/100000534193755/videos/350814810783223
>
All relevant links and details in
>
https://www.novabbs.com/tech/article-flat.php?id=12218&group=sci.physics#12218
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam Banerjee's celestial cyberdogs)
>
Exposes the Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics as rubbish. Trashes all of
modern physics papers.
>
Now that will be some bonfire when all e=mcc documents are burnt.
>
How do you plan to spend your Nobel Prize money, crackpot?
>
Who cares for trifles, Penisnino? That too from those racist and bigoted
unscientific hypocrites. Arindam goes for quintillions worth of stuff
and over the centuries to come. Not counting the immense joy and
purpose...
>
Yeah, sure, Arindam.
>
Right for once, Penisnino.
>
Childish as usual, Arindam.
>
Child-like, Penisnino. Such is Arindam.
>
Childish is what you duped e=mcc chanting apes are. Disastrous chimps!
>
Woof-woof
>
Bertietaylor (Arindam's alternate personality)
>
Real experiments with real data since 1905 says
>
A lie, of course, real experiments are silent.
Brainwashed relativistic idiots, on the other
hand - always have a lot to say.
>
>
>
Einstein was correct and
>
And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
by your mad church "improper" GPS and TAI
clocks keep measuring t'=t, just like all serious
clocks always did.
>
 
This is a steaming pile of insane crackpot babble.
 
 
See, poor insane crackpot - I've proven the mumble
of your idiot  guru to be not even consistent, and
you can  do nothing about it apart of raving, spitting
and insulting.
But you will do what you can for your beloved
Shit and your beloved church.
 
Incoherent gibberish.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Sep 24 * Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo56bertietaylor
17 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo19Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo18bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
18 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16bertietaylor
18 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
19 Sep 24 i      i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
19 Sep 24 i      i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
20 Sep 24 i      i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
20 Sep 24 i      i    `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Jim Pennino
25 Sep 24 i      +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1palsing
25 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5palsing
26 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24 i         +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
1 Oct23:50 i         `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
21 Sep 24 +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo31bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo30Jim Pennino
21 Sep 24 i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo29bertietaylor
21 Sep 24 i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo28Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo27bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo26Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo25bertietaylor
22 Sep 24 i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo24Jim Pennino
22 Sep 24 i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo17Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo16Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo15Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo14Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo13Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo12Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i       i     `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo11Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       i      `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo10Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo8bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i`* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo7Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i       i       i +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
24 Sep 24 i       i       i `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog
24 Sep 24 i       i       i  +- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  +* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Physfitfreak
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  i`- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i       i       i  `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1J. J. Lodder
24 Sep 24 i       i       `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1Maciej Wozniak
23 Sep 24 i       `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo6bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i        `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5Jim Pennino
23 Sep 24 i         `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4bertietaylor
23 Sep 24 i          `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3Jim Pennino
24 Sep 24 i           `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2bertietaylor
25 Sep 24 i            `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor
26 Sep 24 `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo5bertietaylor
26 Sep 24  `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo4Jim Pennino
26 Sep 24   `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo3bertietaylor
27 Sep 24    `* Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo2Jim Pennino
28 Sep 24     `- Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo1bertietaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal