Re: Pseudoscience III: Each SR/GR experiment is a FRAUD!

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:07:10 +0000, rhertz wrote:

======================================================================
That is a rather absurd argument. Consider that the linewidth of the
cesium hyperfine resonance ranges from 1 to 10 Hz, depending on the
atomic beam or fountain configuration, interrogation time, and other
details of clock construction. By your argument, it should be
impossible for even the best cesium clocks to hold time to better than
about 1 part in 9192631770, or 9 microseconds per day. In reality,
the 5071A (a portable cesium beam clock) exhibits an accuracy of
±5×10^−13 and a stability of 2.7×10^−14 over 100,000 s, while cesium
fountain clocks exhibit accuracy and stability in the 10^-16 range.
Are cesium clocks FAKE???
======================================================================
>
Don't forget that 9,192,631,770 Hz IS A CONVENTION, not a constant of
nature. It has intrinsic (and random) noise of about +/- 2.5 Hz, which
traduces into an uncertainty of about 10E-10.
>
Don't confuse Cs133 frequency shift with the shift of the MASTER TCXO
(5 or 10 Mhz), which is THE HEART of the atomic clock, stabilized much
more through negative feedback. This is the clock used for timing, not
the Cs133, which is used as MASTER STABILIZER.

======================================================================
Yes. And don't forget that it is this long term stabilization of the
crystal oscillator against the NOISY input signal comprising trillions
of cesium atoms each second (the beam would generally be in the 1-10
microampere range) that enables the center of the resonance to be
established to within parts per thousand or better of the line width.
Instead of averaging in the frequency domain using a crystal, Pound
and Rebka averaged in the velocity domain recording accumulated counts.
Why do you doubt the possibilty of doing that?
I repeat. Pound and Rebka validated the Local Position Invariance
(LPI) aspect of the equivalence principle, which if false would
disprove Newtonian gravitation as well as general relativity.
Do you really believe that Newtonian gravitation could be FALSE???
======================================================================