Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity

W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:26, Python pisze:

Le 02/10/2024 à 21:21, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 02.10.2024 o 21:00, Python pisze:

Le 02/10/2024 à 20:54, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000001, 01.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Python:
>

But in a relativistic universe where each observer has his own hyperplane of present time?

>
What do you mean by "hyperlane"?

>
The set of all points, which could be connected to an events by a hypothetical signal with infinite velocity builds actually a three dimensional space.
>
In RT-lingo, this is a hyperplane (of the present).
>
Imagine you would 'flatten' space to a 2-dimensional sheet.
>
>
TH
>

...

>
>
Why do you answer him? You can see that he is crazy.
>
He claims to be a great expert in relativity, but he is incapable of understanding what a simple "hyperplane" is.
>
R.H.

>
I do know what a hyperplane is :-) Neither Thomas nor you do :-)
>

>
'Hyperplane' has a sigtly different meaning than 'hyperplane of present time'.
>
But apparently your question was about the 'hyperplane of the present' in context of RT and not about the general case of a hyperplane in mathematics.
>
In case of RT, my explanation was correct!

>
>
The mathematical definition of hyperplane match with the definition
of hyperplane of simultaneity

>
>
Your [snip slander] has no definition
of simultaneity

 We have.

The short legs of your lie has been
already tested, but why not to do it
again.
E1 an event taking place at a GPS
satellite, E2 - an event taking place
in a GPS ground base (or ground facility,
if you wish) - how are you going to
determine whether E1 is simultaneous
to E2 or not, poor lying stinker?