Sujet : Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 05. Oct 2024, 11:54:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <GrePlmG6vRD_1w9ZSTEq9jJqz7M@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 05/10/2024 à 09:35, Thomas Heger a écrit :
Am Donnerstag000003, 03.10.2024 um 14:41 schrieb Richard Hachel:
Le 03/10/2024 à 09:09, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>
My explanation stems from a usualy Minkowski diagramm (the one with a light cone).
This stupid diagram should no longer be used.
Why? ? ?
I personally think, that Minkowski's version of relativity was actually correct.
TH
There are two reasons to abandon the current view of RR and Minkowski's work.
The first reason is that it is ugly, cumbersome, quite abstract and difficult to understand for the young student.
The second reason is even more dramatic: what does it really give for uniformly accelerated frames or rotating frames?
Dr. Hachel claims that everything becomes physically and experimentally false.
So where is the interest?
R.H.
the notion of relativity of simultaneity
Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity