Re: Einstein's Mistakes

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 18:17:17 +0000, rhertz wrote:

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:50:30 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>

E= mc^2 has never been the formula to calculate the energy released in
atomic explosions.

Good to know. The divinity of Einstein comes from the power of this
equation to explain atom bombs, to simple minds.
That only the electrostatic forces underlying radioactivity and
Arindam's formula relating mass and energy kinetically explain far
better, had been suppressed for decades.

>
Serber and Oppenheimer taught (1943) several waves of scientists that
joined the Manhattan Project with lectures prior joining any team, and
Serber wrote the booklet "Los Alamos Primer", where they taught that
energy liberated in the fission of the atom was of electrostatic nature,
due to the repulsion of the byproducts of the fission, plus radiation.

Good.
However text books on nuclear physics explain nuclear power using e=MCC
as gospel truth.
Eg, Kaplan.

>
The numbers given in the booklet are almost a match with E=mc^2
calculations of that epoch, but have NOTHING TO DO with relativity, as
Serber wrote in his 1992 book, once some data of the project was cleared
for publishing.

Public should know that. Text books must be rewritten.

>
But relativists, since 1945 (Time Magazine cover) hyper-hyped the figure
of Einstein and relativism, and the cult succeeded in re-writing
history.

The damage must be undone, asap.