Sujet : Re: Wikipedia crackpottey
De : tomyee3 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 14. Nov 2024, 04:15:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <d56474a0512116a90d1e32bcbf13856c@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:26:35 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:
I find it interesting that the majority of crackpots are crackpots in
only a limited range of topics. They can be quite competent in other
areas. Examples abound, even among Nobelists: Montagnier, Mullis,
Shockley, Pauling etc. come quickly to mind.
>
Why is that interesting? It is the definition of a crackpot.
Great pot, if only...
Touché!
Wikipedia crackpottey
Re: Wikipedia crackpottey