Re: Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities Close to the Speed of Light

Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

Den 16.11.2024 22:45, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
 
Please quote what you are responding to.
========================================
 

J.J.: I did not say that time dilation can only be detected at speeds
close to light.

I said no such thing. Please stop lying about what other people said.

It is idiocy to claim that you didn't say what
you posted the previous day:
 
|Den 15.11.2024 22:52, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
|> Time Dilation Can Only be Detected at Velocities  of
|> Close to the Speed Light
 
 

Relativists at the Google relativity forum told me this.

 
Don't claim that "someone said" without reference or a literal quote.
 

 
The truth is that the difference in the arrival times of the two beams
in the MMX is precisely what time dilation properly refers to.

 
This is incredible stupid!
 
You are claiming that "time dilation" is impossible
because the speed of light is isotropic. :-D
 
----------------------
 
You have no clue what "time dilation" is.
 
Given an inertial frame with two synchronised clocks A1 and A2
a distance L from each other.
Clock B is moving at the speed v in the inertial frame, and passing
the two clocks.
NOTE: all three clocks are running with their proper rate,
advancing one second per second.

Correct of course. Question for LaurenceClarkCrossen:
How do you think any clock could possibly do anything else?
(unless it is broken)

Jan