Re: E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc?? The forgotten Hassenohrl 1905 work.

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:

On 2024-12-01 00:28:14 +0000, rhertz said:
 

Now, E = 3/4 mc? or E = mc??  Which one would the physics community
adopt?

 
The latter because the former was refuted by later experiments, in
particular observations and analysis of radioactive decays.

Yes, it was an elementary error that was easily fixed.
Nevertheless, some people never give up.

There are still papers being written
about the so-called '4/3-problem',
as if that really is a problem,

Jan