Sujet : Re: The Relativity Mafia
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 06. Dec 2024, 22:09:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <dbda7f7a71d55232ce1b2fc8395dd877@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 0:21:29 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 22:17:48 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 13:47:44 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
>
On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 22:27:04 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:08:59 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
>
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:58:53 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
Bertie: I haven't connected with Arindam due to his claims about
ultimate realities. He probably thinks light is affected by gravity and
I don't.
>
You are right and Arindam will agree totally with you for he has proved
that gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon.
>
Bertietaylor
How would that prevent gravity from affecting light?
>
Gravity does not affect light. Light bending is an optical lensing
effect fraudulently passed off as a relativistic effect.
>
Bertietaylor
I agree, but how can that be if light has mass?
Light has no mass. It is aesthetic disturbance.
How can energy exist without mass, especially considering the
mass-energy relation?
The Relativity Mafia
Re: The Relativity Mafia