Re: Anti-relativist

On 12/24/2024 08:12 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Ross Finlayson wrote:

>
Merry Christmas to you, too.  Happy Hanukkah
>
Now go away

>
>
The Truth is...
>
there is no relativity between two clocks!
>
There is no relation between two clocks.
>
There are no forces between two clocks that
would in any way affect one clock from another.
>
NOTHING! No relations to each other!!
>
>
The Truth is...
>
there is no relativity between two clocks!
>
>
>
Does one clock slow the other clock down?
>
>
Of course not!
>
>
There is no relation between two clocks.
>
>
>
Does one clock even care what time it is on the other clock????
>
>
>
there is no relativity between two clocks
>
>
>
And Ross, I don't recall giving you permission to post here...
>
>
>

The problems include that's just making problems.
Being "anti-relativist" may mean being "absolutist",
"idealist", say. Yet, our theories include relativism,
and include absolutism, and include idealism, and
include analytical discourse.
"Relativism" and "The Fourth Dimension" and the
changes of the time's around fin de sciecle or
1900 AD, from "natural order a Newtonian system
of the world" to "logicist positivism an empiricist
pragmatism a scientism", includes many different
changes in the dogma, and the doctrine, of the
discourse.
Then, relating that to "The Jewish Conspiracy",
is not accepted here, and it's just making problems,
might as well be all about "The Bavarian Illuminati",
Einstein's a pretty great guy, yet this is as much
about Carnap and the Vienna Circle, about the
changes from "Greek and German and British idealism",
and "scientist logicist positivism" after Compte and
Boole and Russell and Popper, "logicist positivism".
So, "logicist positivism" then of course made for
"existentialism and nihilism" and that then of
course made for all kinds of terrible things
like Engels and Marx and after Nietszche progressives
the anti-Platonic, rejecting the idealism, rejecting
the absolutism, and taking from the new science
perceived justifications of the free-for-all,
that's rejected by people who know that
there are _both_ of absolutism, and for
mathematical Platonism, and relativism,
or the analytical discourse about the
phenomenological or after Kant and Hegel,
who were both _both_ idealists, and, relativists.
Thusly, "inter-subjectivity" still makes for
an "inter-objectivity", and there are reasons
why one can look at theory that's merely objective
and absolute or merely subjective and relative.
So, I reject that you say anti-relativism is
necessarily anything racist and furthermore
dispute that critically taking apart Einstein's
theory is any attack on the man or his race.
Now, there's a saying "one can't fix stupid",
and it's true some have racist ideologies
that are immaterial to the science itself,
yet trying to make it the other way is
just double-stupid. Because others don't,
and, most don't!
Instead, thinking beings can consider the
greater theory, and have idealism, and have
both the idealist and analytic traditions,
with some sort of merest teleology, for the
ontology, and an object-sense for the necessary
phenomenological import so that theory can be good,
and the parts of that that are "not relativist"
and the parts of that that are "relativist"
can go together just fine.
Everything's related, is the idea.
Try thinking objectively in terms then,
that, it's not about you. Objectively,
personally, it's all about you, objectively,
impersonally, it's none about you.
Racist ideologies have been poisoning
discourse, and it's garbage.
Now, Merry Christmas to you, too. And Happy Hannukah.