Re: Pound-Rebka: ChatGPT is TRAINED to obey, sucking asses of relativists at any cost.

What were the findings of the Pound-Rebka Experiment?
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/362002/what-were-the-findings-of-the-pound-rebka-experiment
***** THE EXPERIMENT IS CONSIDERED AS A NON-RELATIVISTIC PROOF OF
NEWTONIAN THEORY OF LIGHT, AND ITS RESULTS ARE NOT RELATED TO GENERAL
RELATIVITY. THE NARRATIVE ABOUT SUCH EXPERIMENT BEING THE PROOF OF THE
THIRD EINSTEIN'S PREDICTION (MERCURY AND LIGHT DEFLECTION) ABOUT
GRAVITATIONAL RED-SHIFTING IS JUST PROPAGANDA. *****
QUOTE:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pound-Rebka experiment demonstrated that the velocity difference
(acceleration) of photons is "identical to that which a material object
would acquire in free fall", as predicted by Newton's emission theory of
light and in violation of Einstein's relativity:
R. V. Pound and J. L. Snider, Effect of Gravity on Gamma Radiation
(pdf): "It is not our purpose here to enter into the many-sided
discussion of the relationship between the effect under study and
general relativity or energy conservation. It is to be noted that no
strictly relativistic concepts are involved and the description of the
effect as an "apparent weight" of photons is suggestive. The velocity
difference predicted is identical to that which a material object would
acquire in free fall for a time equal to the time of flight."
That the speed of falling light varies like the speed of ordinary
falling bodies is so obvious that many scientists confirm the fact and
so inadvertently disprove Einstein's relativity:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object.
ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a
frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as
it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and
inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets
shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can
measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we
should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This
was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of
the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The
frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical
prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a
gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is
known as the gravitational red shift of light."
Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general
relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of
electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests -
the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion
shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct
prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian
gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle
(gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The
gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound,
Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..."
----------------------------------------------------------------