Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru

Am Montag000023, 23.12.2024 um 21:07 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
 

Am Donnerstag000019, 19.12.2024 um 08:02 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>

Look at this:
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_length_fluctuations#/media/File:Deviation_of

_day_length_from_SI_day.svg

>
We can see, that length of the solar day is shifting by about 1 ms per
day within a year.
>
The length of the day is also about 1 ms longer than 86400 seconds on
average over the entire plot.
>
Would we add this 1 ms to the day, we could see, that Earth' rotation is
actually speeding up occasionally, because the delta t value also goes
down in recent years.
>
Iow: if delta t is less today than half a century ago and we had already
added one or two ms to the day length, now the Earth would rotate faster
than before.
>
This is so because in that case, the cumulative delta t curve would go down.
>
Another good question would be:
>
what causes this pronounced 1ms shift in the length of day within every
single year.
>
This does not sound like much, but actually means, that the Earth
rotation is speeding up and down significantly and with a distinct
measurable pattern of 1ms per day.
>
Given the large mass of the Earth this would require a lot of angular
momentum to be lost and gained (every single year).
>
Somehow I cannot believe this could happen in reality. So, the only
possible explanation is, that the UTC-time itself is shifting by 1ms per
day within a year (which is colossal number, if you take the assumed
precision of atomic clocks into consideration).

 Your mistake lies in the assumption that all those short term
fluctuations involve a change in angular momentum.
Only a part of the long term trend is caused by that,

Actually I had assumed, that Earth cannot loose angular momentum at all.
If now a fluctuation in the apparent length of the solar does occurs, than something must be wrong.
The question would be: what is actually wrong, since it is simply impossible for the entire Earth rotation to speed up and slow down on an annual basis.
Therefore there must be a reason, which is possibly overlooked, that would make the solar day longer over the course of a year and later shorter again.
I personally would guess, that the elliptic form of Earth' orbit around the sun is responsible.
But that would require a reason, which was not yet covered by standard cosmology.
TH