Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe Eisenman c.2017

On 12/28/2024 12:40 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 23.12.2024 01:27, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 14:32:12 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Den 22.12.2024 04:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

He shows that the Maxwell equations are invariant under the Galilean
transformations making the LT invalid.
>
free pdf =
https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Back-to-Galilean-
Transformation-and-Newtonian-Physics-Refuting-the-Theory-of-
Relativity.pdf
>

>

"Conclusion:
The soundness of this article can be checked through the answer to the
following question:
 "Are Maxwell's equations incomplete?",

>
  ∇⋅D = ρ
  ∇⋅B = 0
  ∇×E = − ∂B/∂t
  ∇×H = ∂D/∂t + J
>

namely: are some terms
missing from these equations? If the answer is "no" – this article is
pointless.

>
The answer is 'no'.
>
>

Besides the energy equation,
where do you add the virtual work
and the variational equations?
Which one of Maxwell's pairs of fields,
E x B or D x H, has that they are two
different things, and a fluid model
does not suffice to complete their dynamics.
Of course everybody knows things like
Ohm's law and Kirchhoff's law, while at
the same time there are a further number
of qualitative and quantitative aspects
of electrical and electromagnetic systems,
like remanence, about resonance theory,
just helping explain that electricity its
behavior and modeled as various kinds of
current with various kinds of intensities,
is more than just that there, which is
a very severe abstraction, say.