Re: Relativistic synchronisation method

Le 01/01/2025 à 21:59, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :

 I will stop teasing you.
I understand that irony is wasted on your disturbed mind.
 I am sad to say that it has been fun, but this posting of yours did it.
I can't keep pestering a mentally ill person.
 Have a happy new year in your abstract virtual world!
 Paul

I can tell you exactly the same thing.
For me the theory of relativity is true, but so poorly understood that it is literally stuffed with abstract works.
To think that the present is absolute and flat is abstract.
To believe that all points of a reference frame have the same hyperplane of simultaneity is an abstract idea.
To say that time is more reciprocally slower but that one of the cosmonauts comes back younger without going through the idea of ​​anisochrony, and of the relativity of simultaneity within a chosen stationary reference frame is an abstract idea.
To do as you do integrations of carrots and turnips is an abstract mathematical idea (which immediately gives a false result in accelerated reference frames, Bella is 4.77 years old and not 3.58 years old).
To say that a disk contracts its circumference but not its radius is an abstract idea, even in relativistic physics.
Placing a coordinate y' different from y by rotating the angle (position of the stars) is an abstract idea (I saw you do it). It's wrong, if you had clear ideas your y' would be invariant as Poincaré and Lorentz specify. What varies is x, and the angle alpha, not y. There is no rotation of the aposition, but translation of the position.
Posing the idea of ​​the Andromeda paradox is clearly not having clear ideas, and being eaten up by an abstract idea.
So the opposite is true, I do concrete physics, and those who don't like me do abstract physics.
Have a happy new year in your abstract relativistic world!
R.H.