Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* liscati.fr.invalid (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 09. Jan 2025, 23:20:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <lWXMi3HhkxC_mfo-u-BkijSlH-Q@jntp>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 09/01/2025 à 22:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
 They were not. Relativistic fanatics have just
invented some new meaning for the word "confirmed",
as well as for some  other words involved.
Yes, the theory of relativity has been confirmed many times, but not in the sense that they think.
They think "we have confirmed the theory" when it should be said: "We have confirmed that things are happening in the relationships between space and time".
It is completely different.
And very often, the theory was introduced AFTER the observed facts and as if to explain them. It is therefore only half valid, because it smells of patching.
It would have been useful to predict the facts BEFORE (as I do for rotating frames of reference, accelerated frames of reference, and the spatial zoom effect) that cannot be predicted without a complete mastery of the theory while using the mathematics of an average 18-year-old student.
At this point, it goes without saying that the theory takes on incredible strength, because it is logical and totally predictive. This is not yet the case today, where in scientific circles these predictions cited above do not exist and where the theory is riddled with falsehoods and inexplicable paradoxes.
R.H.
Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jan 25 * "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."17LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Jan 25 +- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1Richard Hachel
9 Jan 25 +* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."5Maciej Wozniak
9 Jan 25 i+* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."2Richard Hachel
10 Jan 25 ii`- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1Maciej Wozniak
9 Jan 25 i+- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1LaurenceClarkCrossen
9 Jan 25 i`- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Jan 25 +- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Jan 25 `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."9LaurenceClarkCrossen
10 Jan 25  `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."8Ross Finlayson
10 Jan 25   `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."7Maciej Wozniak
11 Jan 25    `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."6Ross Finlayson
11 Jan 25     `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."5Maciej Wozniak
11 Jan 25      `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."4Ross Finlayson
11 Jan 25       `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."3Maciej Wozniak
12 Jan 25        `* Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."2Ross Finlayson
12 Jan 25         `- Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."1Maciej Wozniak

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal