Re: "In reality there is almost nothing to understand in the theory of relativity."

On 01/10/2025 11:19 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 11.01.2025 o 06:39, Ross Finlayson pisze:

On 01/10/2025 02:42 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 10.01.2025 o 21:08, Ross Finlayson pisze:
>

>

Leon has an interesting section in his free pdf book "Apparent
Relativity" on the laws of logic and relativity.

>
In reality the principle of Relativity is merely
a negative assertion "motion is relative not absolute"

>
>
Right, The Shit is merely an assertion.
Later on, of course, the term "confirm"
was redefined to make it "confirmed".
>

>
There _is_ space contraction and what's involved
is "Zero-eth laws of motion" and _classical mechanics_
and under-definition in _classical mechanics_, then
that as with regards to Equivalence Principle and
gravity and G-forces, those being different, and,
the aether _not_ existing, makes way for why
the relativistic effects of _charged_ particles
are as observed, while, GR is in _front_ of SR,
with regards to mechanics.

>
As said - merely an assertion.
>
And in the meantime in the real world,
forbidden by your bunch of idiots
improper clocks keep measurig improper
t'=t in improper seconds.
>

So, all you need to do is explain
everything all together.
Physics is more than "Newton's System
of the World", though causality is still
inviolable and there are no closed time-like
curves, and it's a continuum mechanics,
while a super-classical mechanics.