Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:

Le 13/01/2025 à 20:20, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 13/01/2025 à 18:08, Python a écrit :

Le 13/01/2025 à 16:06, Richard Hachel  a écrit :

Le 13/01/2025 à 06:07, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :

On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 1:31:59 +0000, rhertz wrote:

>

And Einstein used a refraction formula to double the deflection=
"photographic plates? Poor did, and he completely repudiated the
findings of Eddington. This should have given pause to any ethical
scientist.
Here are some quotes from Poor's summary: "The mathematical
formula, by which Einstein calculated his deflection of 1.75
seconds for light rays passing the edge of the sun, is a well known
and simple formula of physical optics"; "Not a single one of the
fundamental concepts of varying time, or warped or twisted space,
of simultaneity, or of the relativity of motion is in any way involved
in Einstein's prediction of, or formulas for, the deflection of light";
"The many and elaborate eclipse expeditions have, therefore,
been given a fictitious importance. Their results can neither prove
nor disprove the relativity theory" (emphasis added) (Poor, 1930)." -
saved pdf = "Albert Einsetin, Plagiarist of the Century" p.9

>
Einstein is an artificial media creation. Like Emmanuel Macron or Greta Thunberg. No more.

>
This is a idiotic statement that only shows your own stupidity.

>
Python, you are a hypocrite..
>
You are not going to make me believe that you do not know these things.
>
You have read a lot about Einstein in relativist forums for decades. So you must know what his beginnings are, where and how they were made, how he was awarded a Nobel Prize and then how he was photographed everywhere in the world press. It was obviously a voluntary creation. It is a shame that we can "doubt" it.

 Everything you claimed about Einstein's Nobel Prize are lies. Plain lies. Shameful disgusting lies.
 Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:

Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
would be, and he has written it clearly
enough for anyone able to read (even if not
clearly enough for you, poor stinker).