Liste des Groupes | Revenir à sp relativity |
W dniu 14.01.2025 o 23:10, Python pisze:Clearly not enough...Le 14/01/2025 à 22:50, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :Somehow I do.W dniu 14.01.2025 o 22:39, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:How could you know anything about what GR says or doesn't say as you admit to stay as far as physics as possible
>>>
It is a fact that experiments have shown that GR correctly
predicts how light is gravitational deflected.
A lie, of course - according to [GR],
light [in vacuum] doesn't deflect
and take always straight/geodesic paths.
There is nothing delusional in spacetime. Moreover if you remove the concept of spacetime from GR, is not GR but a fantasy of yours.(for the record: a straight/geodesic path in space-time does not necessarily corresponds to a straight path in space.If we're taking the delusional spacetime of your
bunch of idiots and the real space - sure.
Anyway, according to [GR] of your idiot guruNo. Period.
Light paths [in vacuum] are straight/geodesic
in both.
Maciej is soooIn your silly dreams maybe, in reality certainly NOT.highly confused on everything, especially geometry. It is quite delusional to think that GR pretends so given that planets orbits [in space] are clearly not straight lines even if they correspond to geodesics in space-time).\It's quite delusional, indeed, but I knew some
relativistic [...] insisting on that.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.