Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

"Only experimental evidence can falsify a theory." No, a theory can be
falsified by showing its derivation is false. A false derivation does
not predict, so it doesn't even amount to a theory.
"> Mercury's

perihelion of relativity is based on the assumption that gravity can be
treated as electromagnetism.

Nonsense!"
No, relativity uses the speed of electromagnetism for gravity to explain
the perihelion. Gravity is not electromagnetism. So relativity fails to
explain the perihelion advance.
"> Galileo and

Eotvos showed everything, regardless of the mass or the substance, is
affected the same by gravity. Relativity has not disproved that.

Quite right.
  According to SR/GR, gravitational mass is the same as inertial mass.
What was your point?"
Paul, what is the point if you won't listen with any comprehension?
Relativity claims light is affected differently, twice as much as
everything else. It has not proven that light is affected differently
from everything else. That is a stupid claim. It remains unproven.
"> The

velocity of both waves and particles includes the relative velocity of
the observer, yet relativity irrationally denies this—pure lunacy.

What are you trying to say?
Do you mean that the velocity of a wave or particle relative to
the observer includes the velocity of the observer?
Please explain."
That is what I plainly stated.
I have the quote from Einstein and have shared it here before. He denies
this fact in the case of light.
"> Einstein has stated that if two different forces strike you with the

same force, the effect will be the same! Pure genius! Poor quotes
Einstein's explanation of his equivalence principle: "'The effect of
gravitation upon ideal “clocks” and “measuring rods” at rest at a given
point in a gravitational field is identically the same as that caused by
a motion of the “clock” and “rod” through free space with a velocity
equal to that which they would have acquired had they fallen, under the
action of gravitation, from infinity to that point.'"

How confused is it possible to be? :-D
So you claim that according to Einstein, the equivalence principle
is that a clock which is stationary in a gravitational field
is affected the same way as a free falling clock!"
What is the difference between what you said and the Einstein quote?