Re: About new, better definition of second

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:24, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:22, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:10, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.
>
And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

>
If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would know that it is definitely not "how it works".

>
An idiot screaming "NOOOOOOOO!!!!", spitting
and slandering is not going to change the
facts, sorry

 I didn't scream (you do), I didn't slander (you do).

Was it me talking about the nurses eager
to change your shitty sheets? Really,
you pathetic piece of shit?
Anyway, the case of your insane guru
demonstrates it clearly. An idiot is
mumbling about pears growing  on a
willow - and his obedient doggies
are preparing some new, better
definitons  of pears and willows.
That's how your beloved physics
works, sorry, trash.Not even
talking about training idiots like
you to spit and slander at its
enemies.