Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:25, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:23, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:11, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

Den 15.01.2025 18:36, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

>
I ask you again:
Why do you not understand that Einstein and many other physicists
have shown that it is a fact that GR predicts Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² ?
>
Your opinion of GR is irrelevant.
>
GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection
is confirmed by a number of experiments:
>
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>
You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality.
Your opinion is fantasy.

>

If the derivation is wrong, it doesn't predict. You didn't understand
what Poor said. Poor has directly addressed the "4" in your equation.

>
Understand this:
The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is correct

>
A pity it's not [GR] equation for
light deflection.

 Really? So what is it?

 A formula valid in a model joining
good, old Euclidean geometry with
some minor schemas of The Shit.
 Poincare has been explaining - you
can reject EG, but it's stupid and
will serve you ill. So with all
of those ideological screams  of its
alleged incompability with the
reality - your bunch of idiots is
still applying it  everywhere and
pretending it is not.