Re: About new, better definition of second

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 22:37, Maciej Wozniak pisze:

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 22:25, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Python <jp@python.invalid> wrote:
>

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.
>
And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

>
If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would know
that it is definitely not "how it works".

>
[for the strayed-in, and perhaps misled kiddies, if any]
>
Indeed, relativity, or any other theory, has nothing to do with it.
It is pure empirism

 If an idiot says - simply must be true. No
postulates in The Shit! No definitions in
The Shit! No mathematics (with its axioms)
in The Shit!
Pure empirism, Nature Herself is speaking
through the mouths of relativistic idiots.

And, of course - the fact that it is
Nature Herself speaking through him
is making a relativistic idiot unfailiable.
He can never be mistaken, like ordinary
mortal worms.