Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:11:28 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

Den 15.01.2025 18:36, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

>
I ask you again:
Why do you not understand that Einstein and many other physicists
have shown that it is a fact that GR predicts Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² ?
>
Your opinion of GR is irrelevant.
>
GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection
is confirmed by a number of experiments:
>
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>
You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality.
Your opinion is fantasy.

>

If the derivation is wrong, it doesn't predict. You didn't understand
what Poor said. Poor has directly addressed the "4" in your equation.

>
Understand this:
The equation Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is correct because experiments have
shown that its predictions are correct within the precision
of the measurements, which are in the order of ±0.005%.
>
The equation Θ = 2GM/Δ⋅c² is proven wrong by +100%.
>
Poor had the excuse that he didn't know this because all
the precise measurements are made more that 70 years after
he wrote his paper.
>
But you have no excuse. Is is indeed idiotic to claim
that the equation  Θ = 4GM/Δ⋅c² is wrong when it is so
thoroughly well confirmed to be correct.
>
How is it possible to fail to understand this?

How is it possible for you to fail to address the issue of the
derivation? The experiments can't prove a false derivation.

>

After refusing to divulge his derivation for his doubling, Einstein
finally asserted he got it by employing Huygens' principle. That formula
is for calculating refraction. Then Einstein admits to adding
gravitational effect and refraction to get his doubling. You keep
appealing to the majority and authority instead of reason.

>
>