Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:17:00 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 19:29:51 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

Den 15.01.2025 18:46, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

>
GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection
is confirmed by a number of experiments:
>
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf
https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf
>
You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality.
Your opinion is fantasy.

>

Your opinion and that of the majority and the authorities are irrelevant
fantasies.

>
Quite.
Anybody's fantasies are irrelevant.
>
But the experimental evidence is reality, not fantasy.
>
GR's predictions for the gravitational deflection of EM-radiation
are so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that you have to be
extremely ignorant not to accept it.
>

You fail to address Poor's refutation of the derivation. If
you want to do that, you would need to bring up Trumpler, as I have done
by mentioning his paper.

>
How is it possible to fail to understand that experimental
evidence has proven Poor wrong?

You must be extremely ignorant to think an experiment can prove a false
derivation.

Paul is not extremely ignorant.
Paul is EXTREMELY INDOCTRINATED. Such indoctrination, shown here FOR
ALMOST 30 YEARS, was originated on RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, not on scientific
beliefs.
Paul has to obey, in order to belong. After all, he's nothing more than
a failed EE who needed to believe in something else besides TUTORING how
to program PICs in the '90s.
Poor soul. It must SUCK to be him.