Sujet : Re: ww3
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics sci.physics.relativityDate : 18. Jan 2025, 08:33:15
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lv13pjFi6glU7@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am Donnerstag000016, 16.01.2025 um 09:56 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>
Germany has tried to do this several times and lost every single war
with Russia- mostly very miserably.
>
>
Bullshit, in 1ww Germany beat Russia and forced
to a separate peace.
>
True but a century earlier they thrashed the French.
>
Napoleon was a shithead from Corsica and has invaded Prussia.
>
The French forced Prussia to participate in the war against Russia, what
the Prussians disliked.
>
The scumbag named 'Napoleon' later left the war unharmed, but the
Prussians didn't and died there in large numbers.
>
From Prussian perspective this war had the sole aim to decimate
Prussians.
>
As a revenge the Prussians helped the British to destroy Napoleon in
Waterloo.
>
Russians and Germans were feudal and imperial whereas France was modern
and egalitarian.
>
Napoleon ranks with Alexander, Caesar and Hitler as among the four top
European leaders, for egalitarianism and modernity.
>
All of them did essentially the same thing:
>
they have sent their armies into territories, which were not theirs and
forced the inhabitants of the occupied regions to fight in their army.
>
In case of Napoleon this was a disaster for the Prussians, which died in
large numbers in the Russian winter.
Napoleon invaded Russia as the Czar broke the earlier treaty after
losing a big battle. The idea was to contain Russia, not let it expand
by sea, stop its association with the UK.
>
That stupid corsian piece of shit didn't do that, however, but left the
Prussians there to die together with the French soldiers.
He lost. Russia won and the Cossacks romped in Paris. However those
serfs got ideas from France and over time they grew strong enough to
overthrow the Czar.
>
Hitler did almost the same thing.
Big mistake. That is why there are those who say that Hitler was
actually anti-German or anti-Arya. The greatest conman ever.
The exists a book called 'Hitler was a British agent' by a man nameg 'Greg Hallett'.
That guy wrote also 'Stalin's British training'.
So, Stalin was the greatest 'conman ever', because his head count was much greater.
About Hitler's real identity I had assumed, that it could have been 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.
The reason is a little difficult to explain. But the younger brother of Julian Huxley (head of 'Eugenics') would fit.
...
TH