Re: Division by zero

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp relativity 
Sujet : Re: Division by zero
De : ttt_heg (at) *nospam* web.de (Thomas Heger)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 02. Feb 2025, 07:58:32
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m08jceFtovhU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am Sonntag000002, 02.02.2025 um 03:19 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
On 02/01/2025 01:36 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-02-01 08:14:08 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>
Hi NG
>
I'm actually not really certain, but found an error in Einstein's 'On
the electrodynamics of moving bodies' which is quite serious.
>
>
See page six, roughly in the middle:
>
There we find an equation, which says this:
>
∂τ/∂y= 0
>
Do you mean on page 899 (9th page of the article) in §3?
The operation is not division but a partial derivative.
>
Now, 'tau' is a time belonging to the moving system k.
>
Yes, but it is also a number that is computed from coordinates of K.
>
This system k moves along the x-axis of system K with velocity v,
while x- and xsi-axis coincide and etha- and y axis remain parallel.
>
In other words v_y is permanently zero,
>
Yes,
>
 or: ∂y=0.
>
No. ∂y is not a number but a part of an operator. There are points with
different values of y and ∂/∂y refers to a line where t, x, and z (but not
y) have the same value at every point.
>
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_derivative
>
 Zero meters/second is infinity seconds/meter.
 
yes, but that was my complain!
If there is not movement along the y-axis, then time tau would pass, but y would remain zero.
This would mean, that ∂τ/∂y= infinity  (and NOT zero).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Feb 25 * Division by zero28Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero24Mikko
2 Feb 25 i+* Re: Division by zero5Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
3 Feb 25 ii i`- Re: Division by zero1Paul.B.Andersen
2 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Division by zero (0, 1, infinity)1Ross Finlayson
2 Feb 25 i`* Re: Division by zero18Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i +* Re: Division by zero7Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i i`* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i i `* Re: Division by zero5Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i i  `* Re: Division by zero4Mikko
4 Feb 25 i i   `* Re: Division by zero3Thomas Heger
5 Feb 25 i i    `* Re: Division by zero2Mikko
5 Feb 25 i i     `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
2 Feb 25 i `* Re: Division by zero10Mikko
3 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Division by zero9Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   +* Re: Division by zero2Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Feb 25 i   i`- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
3 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Division by zero6Mikko
3 Feb 25 i    +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
4 Feb 25 i    `* Re: Division by zero4Thomas Heger
4 Feb 25 i     `* Re: Division by zero3Mikko
4 Feb 25 i      +- Re: Division by zero1Maciej Wozniak
5 Feb 25 i      `- Re: Division by zero1Thomas Heger
1 Feb 25 +* Re: Division by zero2J. J. Lodder
2 Feb 25 i`- Re: Division by zero1Ross Finlayson
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Division by zero1JanPB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal