Den 07.02.2025 21:59, skrev rhertz:
You keep insisting with my older post, where I used ξ(x', Δt₁) = x' as
an EVENT
in k, to which I recognized that lacks FORMALISM but NOT MEANING!
This alone allow me to double down calling you Dono+ or an EINSTEIN'S
POSSESSED
malignant being. This is because you punch below the belt instead of
REASONING.
Naming the event at reflection point as ξ(x', Δt₁) = x' is a way to
conjugate the two parameters that exist in such event. I said that it
doesn't mean that
ξ(x', Δt₁) IS A FUNCTION!
An "event" is a "point" in space and time.
It is not "in" a specific frame of reference, but the event
has a set of coordinates in each frame of reference.
When you write ξ(x', Δt₁) = x' it means that it is an event E
with the coordinates x', Δt₁ in frame K, and ξ(x', Δt₁) is
the functions that transforms the coordinates of the Event E in K
to the spatial coordinate in k.
You claim:
ξ₁ = ξ(x', Δt₁) = x'
In other words, you claim that the spatial coordinate
always is the same in K and k.
But you insist being cheap and low. It's your nature, not mine. I don't
TROLL anyone here in the way you do. What are you? An stupid 7 y.o. kid?
Idiot.
So even a stupid 7 y.o. kid could point out your errors? :-D
Even if your errors are rather glaring I think this is an exaggeration.
I didn't read a fucking word about my new post above yours,
I am using the USENET provider Eternal-september, and there is no
"new" post above mine. So I hadn't seen it when I wrote the response.
However, I have also access to another provider (Eweka) where I
found your post. I also found the reason why it didn't show up on
Eternal-september.
Traditionally, the USENET discussion groups, like the sci.* groups,
are text-only groups, and posts to these groups should not have
attachments. Most text-only USENET providers will _not_ accept posts with attachments. Eternal-september does not. And since this is
the most used free USENET provider, few people will see your posts
with attachments.
where I
changed x'
as being a fixed point in the K frame. What? Did you panic, relativist?
-----------------------
[ remark begins
Information to lurkers before they read the rest:
There are three events, E₀ , E₁ and E₂.
The coordinates of E₀ are:
in K: x₀ = 0, t₀ = 0
in k: ξ₀ = 0, τ₀ = 0
The coordinates of E₁ are:
in K: x₁ = x', t₁ = x'/(c-v)
in k: ξ₁ = ? , Δτ₁ = ?
The coordinates of E₂ are:
in K: x₂ = 0, t₂ = x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v)
in k: ξ₂ = 0 , Δτ₂ = ?
(ignore the Δs, ? are unknown)
] remark ends
--------------------
I have now read your attachment, and I didn't panic.
I was however mildly shocked by the extent of your confusion.
What I found was this:
Δτ₁ = x'/(c-v)
Δτ₂ = x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v)
τ₁ = τ₀ + Δτ₁
τ₂ = τ₀ + Δτ₂
I won't bother to yet again explain why this is nonsense,
because you are unable to learn.
No point in going on.
----------------------------
I will however repeat:
It is a _fact_ that the Lorentz transform follows
from the postulates of SR.
You can, and do, claim that SR and its postulates are wrong,
and that the vast amount of experimental evidence confirming SR
is made by fraudulent physicist who are members of a MAFFIA.
But you can't dispute the fact that the Lorentz transform
follows from the postulates of SR.
-- Paulhttps://paulba.no/
Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms
Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms