Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms

On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 21:18:52 +0000, Python wrote:

Le 08/02/2025 à 18:03, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

Asked to Google:
>
What is x' in Einstein's derivation of Lorentz transforms?
>
Answer from Google AI (which is a resume of many documents):
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>
AI Overview
>
In Einstein's derivation of the Lorentz transformations, "x'" represents
the position of an event as measured in a moving reference frame
(denoted as S'), while "x" represents the position of the same event in
a stationary reference frame (S); essentially, it's the transformed
x-coordinate in the moving frame, taking into account the relative
velocity between the two frames.

>
You are confused by IA (i.e. LLM) which is "trained" on numerous, mainly
recent sources. What it says is true when it comes to modern conventions
when it comes to frames and coordinates names choices but was not the
case
in 1905, Einstein used *different* conventions. If you had a clue you
would have noticed.
>
LLM are useless if you have NO clue on a given subject. You have no clue
in physics, especially Relativity. By dialoguing with LLM on such a
subject you are polluting your own mind with nonsense.
>
This is quite pathetic.

The OP and the rest of my posts here are not based on any information
given
by AI.
And you have a point: for historic analysis of 115 years old
derivations, either
ChatGPT or DeepSeek fail miserably. They can't adjust their failed
derivations with the original notations and concepts from the 1905
paper.
I created the OP just by analyzing the Point 3 of 1905 Einstein paper. I
knew for years that such derivation was FRAUDULENT, because Einstein
CHEATED.
I had strong discussions with Dono and van der Moortel by 2020, and I
stated
the same things that I wrote here.
Nothing is pathetic, asshole.
I'm just doing this for fun. I'm not a fucking fanatic like you or Paul,
etc.