Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms

Le 08/02/2025 à 21:14, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 19:54:58 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 

Den 07.02.2025 21:59, skrev rhertz:

>
You keep insisting with my older post, where I used ξ(x', Δt₁) = x' as
an EVENT
in k, to which I recognized that lacks FORMALISM but NOT MEANING!
This alone allow me to double down calling you Dono+ or an EINSTEIN'S
POSSESSED
malignant being. This is because you punch below the belt instead of
REASONING.

Relativity is a pseudoscience that gain control of the ability to reason
for those "Einstein's zombies" with no brain. Freaks possessed with
Einstein's demons, that have a herd mentality. Poor people.

The theory of special relativity (I don't like this word but it doesn't matter, if I said all the words I don't like, I'd end up in jail or murdered, LOL) tries to explain the relationships between space and time, and especially between frames of reference moving relative to each other.
I classify in the theory of special relativity all the problems that have nothing to do with significant masses capable of gripping space and twisting it with their little hooked fingers.
So the theory of special relativity includes for me, Galilean frames of reference, uniformly accelerated frames of reference, and rotating frames of reference (I gave a definitive form to all these concepts).
Thus, depending on the position and speed of the observers, things that were believed to be immutable become relative. A second is no longer a second, time can appear to expand (the other watch beats slower) to contract (the other watch beats MORE quickly), lengths, distances can do the same, either expand or contract.
Wavelengths (or their inverse which is their electromagnetic frequency) can do the same thing. Blue can be seen as green, or the opposite, yellow can be seen as red, or the opposite.
I am surprised that even today we do not understand these things, neither among the "cranks" who deny everything, nor among the professionals, who do not deny everything, but understand only half of things.
R.H.